※ This article contains content originally published by a third party on May 7, 2023. Please refer to the bottom of the article for the copyright notice regarding this content.
In this analysis, we will be taking a closer look at two decentralized exchanges: dYdX and GMX. The decentralized exchange market has been growing rapidly, and these two platforms have been gaining popularity among traders. We will provide an overview of each platform, highlighting their features, advantages, and disadvantages. We will also discuss the similarities and differences between these two exchanges, with a particular focus on their exchange models and trading capabilities. Through this analysis, we aim to provide readers with a better understanding of these two exchanges and help them make informed decisions on which platform may suit their trading needs better.
dYdX is a leading decentralized exchange for trading perpetual contracts of digital assets. Trading perpetual contracts enable traders to profit from price movements without actually owning the underlying asset and without the limitations of contract expiration. It is an orderbook-based DEX, which means users can place and match buy and sell orders. dYdX supports both limit and market orders, as well as margin trading with up to 10x leverage. The dYdX protocol is built on the Ethereum blockchain and utilizes smart contracts through a Starkware Layer 2 technology known as StarkEx.
- Supports margin trading with up to 10x leverage
- Integrates with the Layer 2 scaling solution, StarkWare, for faster and cheaper trades
- Allows for advanced trading strategies, such as limit orders
- High liquidity for popular tokens
- Supports trading for a variety of ERC-20 tokens
+) The volume-weighted maker-taker fee schedule is based on a 30-day volume, with six levels ranging from free to VIP, as shown below.
|From (30D Volume in USD)
To (30D Volume in USD)
GMX is a decentralized exchange that operates on the Avalanche and Arbitrum network. It is an Automated Market Maker (AMM) DEX, which means it uses a mathematical algorithm to determine the prices of assets and facilitate trades. GMX stands out with its unique liquidity model as it utilizes a GLP liquidity pool rather than relying on the conventional order book or default AMM model. Instead, it operates based on a multi-asset liquidity model. This enables users to directly acquire and stake the GMX Protocol's liquidity token, GLP, and actively participate in market making. The platform establishes prices by leveraging Chainlink oracles and accessing price feeds from prominent centralized exchanges (CEXs). Consequently, GMX claims to facilitate trades with zero-price impact.
- High liquidity and ease of use
- Supports trading for a variety of tokens, including non-fungible tokens
- Offers yield farming and liquidity mining incentives for users who provide liquidity to the platform
- Unique pricing algorithm helps to reduce price slippage
|Arbitrum (Ethereum L2 solution)
StarkEx (Ethereum L2 solution)
|Network execution fees
|No gas fees
|0.1% of position size when opening and closing a position.
|- Tiered trading fee structure: 0% taker and maker fees for trading volumes below $100,000.
- 0.02% taker fees and 0.05% maker fees for trading volumes between $100,000-1,000,000.
- Tier-based fee deductions after $1,000,000.
|Amount of leverage
|Up to 50x
|Up to 20x
As we can see from the table, dYdX's advantages include a wide range of perpetual contracts for trading, a liquidity mining program that rewards traders for providing liquidity, low trading fees compared to other decentralized exchanges, active development and frequent platform updates, and a user-friendly interface with an easy-to-use trading interface. However, its disadvantages include a limited range of trading pairs available on the platform, no staking rewards or other incentives for holding the token, no token burn program in place to reduce the circulating supply and increase the value of the token, no buyback and make program in place to increase the value of the token, and a relatively low trading volume compared to larger centralized exchanges.
In comparison, GMX's advantages include unique prediction markets for trading on future events, a token burn program that helps to reduce the circulating supply and increase the value of the token, a buyback and make program that uses platform revenue to buy and burn tokens, increasing their value, a well-established community with strong support for the platform, and high trading volume with a wide range of cryptocurrency trading pairs. However, its disadvantages include no fee discount for token holders or other incentives for holding the token, a limited range of cryptocurrencies available for trading, no staking rewards or other incentives for holding the token, a less intuitive user interface compared to other decentralized exchanges, and no mobile app available for trading on-the-go.
|Crypto and perpetual contracts
|Crypto and prediction markets
|Buyback and Make Program
As we can see from the table, both dYdX and GMX share some common features, such as being decentralized, offering liquidity mining incentives, having governance rights for token holders, and providing token utility within their respective ecosystems. However, they also have some differences, such as dYdX offering perpetual contracts and a fee discount for $DYDX token holders, while GMX offers prediction markets, a token burn program, and a buyback and make program.
The success of GMX's tokenomics can be attributed to several key factors:
- Token Burn: A portion of the trading fees generated on the GMX platform is used to buy back and burn the GMX token, which reduces the total supply of tokens and increases their value over time. This mechanism helps to create a deflationary pressure on the token and incentivizes long-term holding.
- Liquidity Mining: The platform offers liquidity mining incentives to users who provide liquidity to the GMX-ETH pool on Uniswap. This incentivizes users to provide liquidity, which helps to deepen the liquidity pool and improve the platform's trading capabilities.
- Buyback and Make Program: GMX has a "Buyback and Make" program that uses a portion of the trading fees generated on the platform to buy back and stake the GMX token. This helps to reduce the circulating supply of GMX tokens and increase their value over time.
- Governance: GMX token holders have governance rights and can participate in the platform's decision-making process by voting on proposals such as changes to trading fees, token listings, and other platform upgrades.
- Token Utility: GMX tokens have utility within the GMX ecosystem, as users can use them to pay for trading fees and access premium features on the platform. Additionally, GMX has partnerships with other DeFi projects that enable GMX holders to use their tokens for other purposes, such as liquidity provision and lending.
Overall, GMX's tokenomics is designed to create a positive feedback loop that incentivizes long-term holding, liquidity provision, and platform usage. The combination of token burn, liquidity mining, governance, and token utility creates a strong value proposition for GMX tokens, which has contributed to their success.
※ GMX Ecosystem: $GMX, $GLP and $esGMX
- GMX is the native token of the GMX DEX, and it has multiple use cases such as providing governance rights, transaction fee discounts, and rewards for liquidity providers.
- GLP(GMX Liquidity Provision) is a second token in the GMX ecosystem, which is earned by providing liquidity to the GMX pools. GLP acts as a long-term incentive to encourage liquidity providers to stay in the pool and reduce impermanent loss. GLP holders also receive a share of the trading fees generated by the pool proportional to their stake in the pool.
- esGMX(Escrowed GMX) is a token that represents locked GMX tokens, and it is used to participate in the GMX liquidity mining program. Liquidity providers can deposit GMX tokens into the liquidity mining program and receive esGMX tokens in return, which can be staked to earn GMX rewards. esGMX tokens are not tradable and can only be redeemed for the underlying GMX tokens after the lock-up period ends.
- The existence of GLP and esGMX tokens in the GMX tokenomics has a positive impact on the price of GMX tokens. GLP incentivizes liquidity providers to stay in the pools for a longer period, resulting in a more stable and liquid market. The liquidity provided by the GLP holders also helps to reduce the trading fees, which attracts more traders to the GMX DEX.
Similarly, the liquidity mining program using esGMX tokens incentivizes users to provide liquidity to the GMX pools, which increases the liquidity and trading volume of GMX tokens. This program also helps to lock up a significant portion of the GMX token supply, reducing the sell pressure on the GMX token.
Overall, the GMX tokenomics with multiple tokens, such as GMX, GLP, and esGMX, creates a robust and sustainable ecosystem that benefits all participants. The tokens' interdependence and the reward mechanisms incentivize liquidity provision, which leads to a more liquid and stable market and higher prices for the GMX token.
The GMX DEX's increasing trading volume and liquidity are reflected in the price of the GMX token, which has been showing an upward trend in recent months. According to CoinMarketCap, the GMX token's price has increased by over 400% in the last six months, which can be attributed to the growing adoption of the GMX DEX and the positive effects of its tokenomics.
- Trading Fee Discount: Users who hold dYdX's native token, $DYDX, can receive a discount on trading fees when using the dYdX platform. This creates a strong incentive for users to hold and use $DYDX tokens on the platform.
- Liquidity Mining: dYdX offers liquidity mining incentives to users who provide liquidity to the protocol's liquidity pools. This incentivizes users to provide liquidity, which helps to deepen the liquidity pool and improve the platform's trading capabilities.
- Staking Rewards: dYdX has a staking program that allows users to earn rewards in $DYDX for staking their tokens. This creates a further incentive for users to hold and stake their tokens on the platform.
- Token Buybacks: dYdX has conducted several token buybacks, using a portion of the platform's profits to buy back $DYDX tokens from the market. This helps to reduce the circulating supply of $DYDX tokens and increase their value over time.
- Governance: $DYDX token holders have governance rights and can participate in the platform's decision-making process by voting on proposals such as changes to trading fees, token listings, and other platform upgrades.
Overall, dYdX's tokenomics is designed to create a positive feedback loop that incentivizes long-term holding, liquidity provision, and platform usage. The combination of trading fee discounts, liquidity mining, staking rewards, token buybacks, and governance creates a strong value proposition for $DYDX tokens, which has contributed to their success.
While there are some similarities between dYdX and GMX tokenomics, such as liquidity mining incentives, token buybacks, and governance rights, there are also some differences. For example, dYdX offers a trading fee discount and staking rewards, while GMX has a token burn program and a buyback and make program. Ultimately, the success of each tokenomics will depend on a variety of factors, such as user adoption, platform performance, and market conditions.
|Key Success Factors
|Trading Fee Discount
|Buyback and Make Program
Note: ✔️ indicates that the factor is present and contributing to the tokenomics success, while ❌ indicates that the factor is absent.
As we can see from the table, both dYdX and GMX have several key success factors in their tokenomics. Both platforms offer liquidity mining incentives, token buybacks, and governance rights to their token holders. However, they differ in other areas such as trading fee discounts, staking rewards, token burn, and buyback and make program. Additionally, both tokens have utility within their respective ecosystems. Ultimately, the success of each tokenomics depends on a variety of factors, including user adoption, platform performance, and market conditions.
Both dYdX and GMX are decentralized exchanges that operate on the Ethereum network, albeit on different scaling solutions. Both DEXes offer a range of cryptocurrencies for trading, although GMX also supports non-fungible tokens. Both platforms offer high liquidity and secure trading.
The main difference between dYdX and GMX is the type of exchange model they use. dYdX is an orderbook-based DEX, allowing users to place and match buy and sell orders, while GMX is an AMM-based DEX, which uses a mathematical algorithm to determine prices and facilitate trades. Additionally, dYdX supports margin trading with up to 10x leverage, while GMX offers yield farming and liquidity mining incentives for users who provide liquidity to the platform.
Overall, both dYdX and GMX have their advantages and disadvantages. dYdX offers advanced trading strategies and margin trading with higher leverage, while GMX offers high liquidity and ease of use, as well as incentives for liquidity providers. The choice between the two ultimately depends on the individual's trading preferences and risk tolerance.
dYdX may be better suited for traders who prioritize margin trading, futures contracts, and cross-margining. It offers a wide range of trading pairs and has a user-friendly interface. However, it may not be the best choice for those who prefer a more traditional order book style of trading.
On the other hand, GMX is a suitable option for traders who value simplicity and ease of use, as it employs an automated market maker (AMM) model. It has lower fees compared to dYdX and offers a range of trading pairs. However, it may not be the best choice for traders looking to engage in complex trading strategies or margin trading.
Ultimately, traders should consider their individual needs and preferences when choosing a DEX between dYdX and GMX.
-> Click here to read the full report.